Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Debate
    • Overview
    • Positions
    • Arguments
    • Evidence
  • Resources
    • News
    • Bibliography
    • Authors
    • Organizations
  • About
    • Blog
  • Contact
Login     Register for an account
ARGUMENTS
  • Recent
  • Alphabetical List
  • Most Active
  • Random

COMPARE

U.S. would be obligated to transfer technology under UNCLOS

Although the 1994 treaty modifications have toned down some of the most direct mandatory technology transfer requirements, the treaty still places at risk some very sensitive, and militarily useful, technology which may readily be misused by the navies of ocean mining states.

Keywords: 
Technology Transfer
Related Quotes:
  • Pernicious effect of technology transfer provision still in effect even after 1994 agreement
  • Entrepreneurs likely to be deterred from investing in technology and research necessary for deep seabed mining by excessive royalties requirements
  • Technology transfer provisions of UNCLOS could be used to acquire militarily significant dual-use technologies
  • Even with amendments, 1994 agreement still puts sensitive military technology at risk of transfer
  • ... and 7 more quote(s)
Parent Arguments: 
  • U.S. ratification of UNCLOS would be disadvantageous
Counter Argument: 
  • U.S. will not be obligated to transfer technology under UNCLOS

VERSUS

U.S. will not be obligated to transfer technology under UNCLOS

While article 144 of the convention does encourage technology transfer, Section 5 of the 1994 agreement eliminated this mandate and included other provisions to protect sensitive military technologies.

Keywords: 
Technology Transfer
Related Quotes: 
  • Treaty modifications in 1994 addressed national security concerns over technology transfer provisions
  • Controversial technology transfer provisions have been removed from the convention
  • 1994 agreement removed obligations of member states to transfer technology or share revenue
  • Technology transfers have been eliminated from the treaty and military sensitive technology was never at risk
Parent Arguments: 
  • U.S. ratification of UNCLOS will not be detrimental
Counter Argument: 
  • U.S. would be obligated to transfer technology under UNCLOS

Open Debate Engine Status Block

There are currently:
  • 2 positions
  • 129 arguments
  • 1312 quotes
  • 220 citations
  • 590 news articles

There are 166 orphaned quotes, or 13% of existing quotes.

  • Arguments
  • Authors
  • Cases
  • Citations
  • Evidence
  • News
  • Organizations
  • Positions
About  —  Contact  —  Updates
Terms of Use  —  Privacy Policy
Site powered by the Open Debate Engine.