Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Debate
    • Overview
    • Positions
    • Arguments
    • Evidence
  • Resources
    • News
    • Bibliography
    • Authors
    • Organizations
  • About
    • Blog
  • Contact
Login     Register for an account
ARGUMENTS
  • Recent
  • Alphabetical List
  • Most Active
  • Random

COMPARE

Dispute resolution mechanisms in UNCLOS do not threaten U.S. military action

Some opponents of UNCLOS have argued that by ratifying UNCLOS, U.S. military forces could be subject to adverse ruling by international tribunals through the dispute resolution mechanisms of the treaty. However, the U.S. defense department has reviewed the relevant law and has found no undue liability risk to U.S. forces. Furthermore, in the Senate's Advice and Consent resolution that would ratify UNCLOS, the U.S. has taken advantage of article 298(1) in UNCLOS to exempt itself from all dispute settlement.

Keywords: 
Dispute Resolution
Related Quotes:
  • US advice and consent resolution regarding UNCLOS already excludes military activities from third party arbitration
  • On balance the U.S should welcome the dispute resolution mechanisms in the treaty
  • U.S. can issue signing statement upon ratifying UNCLOS that clarifies to interpretation of the military activities exemption
  • U.S. can exempt its military activities from dispute resolution tribunals
  • ... and 10 more quote(s)
Parent Arguments: 
  • Dispute resolution mechanisms in UNCLOS are not a reason to reject the treaty
Supporting Arguments: 
  • U.S. has resolved the ambiguity in military activities exemption clause
Counter Argument: 
  • U.S. ratification of UNCLOS would subject U.S. military to rulings by third-party tribunals

VERSUS

U.S. ratification of UNCLOS would subject U.S. military to rulings by third-party tribunals

Acceding to UNCLOS would expose the U.S. to lawsuits on virtually any maritime activity, such as alleged pollution of the marine environment from a land-based source or through the atmosphere. Regardless of the merits, the U.S. would be forced to defend itself against every such lawsuit at great expense to U.S. taxpayers. Any judgment rendered by an UNCLOS tribunal would be final, could not be appealed, and would be enforceable in U.S. territory.

Keywords: 
Dispute Resolution
Related Quotes:
  • Navy would be the target of a deluge of lawsuits under UNCLOS
  • Under UNCLOS, US could be subject to arbitrary lawsuits with binding authority for international tribunals
  • U.S. ability to exclude its military from arbitration is not absolute and our adversaries will use that to their advantage
  • Even proponents of Law of Sea acknowledge ambiguity of 'military activities' clause could lead tribunal to rule against U.S. military
  • ... and 4 more quote(s)
Parent Arguments: 
  • U.S. ratification of UNCLOS would damage national security
Counter Argument: 
  • Dispute resolution mechanisms in UNCLOS do not threaten U.S. military action

Open Debate Engine Status Block

There are currently:
  • 2 positions
  • 129 arguments
  • 1312 quotes
  • 220 citations
  • 590 news articles

There are 166 orphaned quotes, or 13% of existing quotes.

  • Arguments
  • Authors
  • Cases
  • Citations
  • Evidence
  • News
  • Organizations
  • Positions
About  —  Contact  —  Updates
Terms of Use  —  Privacy Policy
Site powered by the Open Debate Engine.