Ratifying the Law of the Sea treaty will undermine U.S. sovereignty
President Reagan rejected the Law of the Sea Convention in 1982 and cited several major deficiencies, none of which have been remedied. Reagan was concerned that the U.S., though a major naval power, would have little influence at the International Seabed Authority that the convention created. Although the Authority is supposed to make decisions by consensus, nothing prevents the rest of the “international community” from consistently voting against the United States, as regularly occurs in similar U.N. bodies, such as the General Assembly. In addition, President Reagan was troubled by the fact that the International Seabed Authority has the power to amend the convention without U.S. consent. That concern has also not been remedied in the intervening years.
Related argument(s) where this quote is used.
Parent Arguments:Counter Argument:
- Benefits to U.S. from UNCLOS support for freedom of navigation rights is outweighed by loss of sovereignty
- Ratifying the Law of the Sea treaty will undermine U.S. sovereignty
- UNCLOS represents a subjugation of American foreign policy to United Nations
- UNCLOS creates multiple institutions that would abrogate U.S. sovereignty
- UNCLOS would establish global rule of law over states subordinating their powers to a new authority