Benefits to U.S. from UNCLOS support for freedom of navigation rights is outweighed by loss of sovereignty
The most persuasive argument for the Law of the Sea Treaty is the U.S. Navy's desire to shore up international navigation rights. It is true that the Treaty might produce some benefits, clarifying some principles and perhaps making it easier to resolve certain disputes. But our Navy has done quite well without this treaty for the past two hundred years, relying often on centuries-old, well-established customary international law to assert navigational rights. Ultimately, it is our naval power that protects international freedom of navigation. The Law of the Sea Treaty would not make a large enough additional contribution to counterbalance the problems it would create.
Testimony of Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld ." Testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, June 14, 2012. [ More (3 quotes) ]
"Quicktabs: Evidence
Arguments
Related argument(s) where this quote is used.
-
Keywords:Related Quotes:
- Benefits to U.S. from UNCLOS support for freedom of navigation rights is outweighed by loss of sovereignty
- Ratifying the Law of the Sea treaty will undermine U.S. sovereignty
- UNCLOS represents a subjugation of American foreign policy to United Nations
- UNCLOS creates multiple institutions that would abrogate U.S. sovereignty
- UNCLOS would establish global rule of law over states subordinating their powers to a new authority
Parent Arguments:Counter Argument: