UNCLOS regime is key component of U.S.-led liberal order
More broadly, the UNCLOS regime is part of the bedrock of the U.S.-led liberal order. As G. John Ikenberry argued in After Victory, since the Congress of Vienna, leading states have employed institutional strategies as mechanisms to establish restraints on arbitrary state power and embed a favorable and resilient international system. In this instance, the Convention and 1994 Agreement were negotiated during a time of U.S. ascendance and Western unity in international affairs. At ASIL, Myron Nordquist, Associate Director of the Center for Oceans Law and Policy, expounded on how UNCLOS reflects important U.S. interests regarding restraints on economic exclusive zone, continental shelf resources, innocent passage across the territorial waters, the passage rules for transiting straits and archipelagic sea lanes, and, of course, the high seas freedoms. U.S. ratification will serve to “lock in” these advantages, negotiated by the United States from a position of primacy in world affairs.
Related argument(s) where this quote is used.
Since UNCLOS is the basis of modern international law of the sea, the U.S. should ratify the Convention in order to more effectively exercise, maintain, and perpetuate its leadership and to strengthen the normative framework that UNCLOS provides.Related Quotes:
- UNCLOS has proven itself as valuable global framework for resolving maritime conflicts
- UNCLOS is a remarkable peacetime achievement in resolving border disputes without conflict
- U.S. can best leverage norming effect of international law by ratifying UNCLOS
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS will help U.S. resolve 30-40 existing boundary disputes
- ... and 5 more quote(s)