U.S. needs to accede to UNCLOS to be able to hold other countries to same rule of law standard
[ Page 2 ]
LOSC provides a formal and consistent framework for the peaceful resolution of maritime disputes. It defines the extent of control nations can legally assert at sea and prescribes procedures to counter excessive maritime claims. Acceding to LOSC will increase our credibility in invoking and enforcing the treaty’s provisions and maximize our influence in the interpretation and application of the law of the sea. Recent interference with our operations in the Western Pacific and rhetoric by Iran to close the Strait of Hormuz underscore the need to use the Convention to clearly identify and respond to violations of international law that seek to constrain access to international waters. As a party to the Convention, we will bolster our position to press the rule of law and maintain the freedom to conduct military activities in these areas.
Statement of Admiral Jonathan Greenert: The Law of the Sea Convention: Perspectives from the U.S. Military ." Testimony before the Testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, June 14, 2012. [ More (2 quotes) ]"
Related argument(s) where this quote is used.
Since UNCLOS is the basis of modern international law of the sea, the U.S. should ratify the Convention in order to more effectively exercise, maintain, and perpetuate its leadership and to strengthen the normative framework that UNCLOS provides.Related Quotes:
- UNCLOS has proven itself as valuable global framework for resolving maritime conflicts
- UNCLOS is a remarkable peacetime achievement in resolving border disputes without conflict
- U.S. can best leverage norming effect of international law by ratifying UNCLOS
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS will help U.S. resolve 30-40 existing boundary disputes
- ... and 5 more quote(s)