Evidence: Alphabetical
- 1994 Agreement has not changed intent of International Seabed Authority
- 1994 Agreement does not give U.S. a true veto in the International Seabed Authority
- 1958 Convention already regulates U.S. naval rights to board ships and submarines
- 1994 agreement removed obligations of member states to transfer technology or share revenue
- 1994 agreement leaves anti competitive production control regulations in place in UNCLOS
- 1994 agreement still retains mandatory payments to the ISA that could then be redistributed to unfriendly nations
- 1994 agreement did not amend UNCLOS and its terms are not binding on parties to UNCLOS
- 1994 amendment did not remove onerous information sharing requirements of UNCLOS
- 1994 Agreement gave U.S. Permanent seat in Council of international seabed authority with significant ability to affect votes
- 1994 agreement removed all of the disputed components of the original deep seabed mingling provisions to the benefit of the developed world
- 1994 Part XI Agreement effectively gave U.S veto authority over budget allocation of the International Seabed Authority
- 1994 agreement fixed the previous objections to the mining regime by applying free market principles