Arguments: Alphabetical List
- U.S. ability to conduct maritime interdiction operations will not be curtailed by UNCLOS (644)
- U.S. ability to conduct maritime interdiction operations would be curtailed by UNCLOS (605)
- U.S. ability to peacefully resolve South China Sea disputes compromised by its non-party status to UNCLOS (1228)
- U.S. adherence to UNCLOS would jeopardize maritime intelligence gathering operations (850)
- U.S. adversaries are using its absence from UNCLOS to push excessive maritime claims (651)
- U.S. already abides by UNCLOS as a matter of customary international law and domestic policy (855)
- U.S. can best challenge China's excessive claims as a party to UNCLOS (1776)
- U.S. can best influence China to abide by international rule of law as a party to UNCLOS (1773)
- U.S. can extend the range of territory under its sovereign control by ratifying UNCLOS (1541)
- U.S. can make claim to Arctic resources without being party to UNCLOS (845)
- U.S. can mine the deep seabed without ratifying UNCLOS (1213)
- U.S. can't secure claims to Arctic resources through CLCS as a non-party to UNCLOS (1717)
- U.S. could rely on bilateral treaties as an alternative to UNCLOS regime (868)
- U.S. does not need to ratify UNCLOS to preserve freedom of navigation rights (865)
- U.S. failure to ratify UNCLOS complicates U.S. naval operations in the Arctic (811)
- U.S. failure to ratify UNCLOS has been detrimental (653)
- U.S. failure to ratify UNCLOS has not been detrimental (654)
- U.S. has already accepted "common heritage of mankind" principle in previous agreements and domestic law (869)
- U.S. has resolved the ambiguity in military activities exemption clause (1594)
- U.S. has significant economic interests in emerging deep seabed mining industry (945)
- U.S. has significant interests in untapped mineral wealth in Arctic (844)
- U.S. is losing emerging Arctic race by not being party to UNCLOS (846)
- U.S. is not losing out by not having a seat on CLCS (1716)
- U.S. is not losing out in Arctic by not being party to UNCLOS (847)
- U.S. must challenge China's flawed interpretation of UNCLOS freedom of navigation provisions (1772)
- U.S. Navy's freedom of navigation is continually challenged by excessive claims (858)
- U.S. non-party status to UNCLOS is undermining ability to conduct maritime interdiction operations (645)
- U.S. not losing ability to guide maritime law by not being party to UNCLOS (1593)
- U.S. participation in UNCLOS will not undermine national sovereignty (659)
- U.S. participation in UNCLOS will undermine national sovereignty (660)
- U.S. position as a leader has been damaged by non-participation (663)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS best way to preserve freedom of navigation rights (864)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS critical to naval soft power needed for cooperation with other navies (1314)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS is key to sustaining competitiveness of U.S. shipping industry (1474)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS is not necessary for development of offshore oil and gas industry (857)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS key to a number of maritime industries (649)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS key to development of deep seabed mining industry (396)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS necessary to control overfishing (863)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS treaty necessary to restore maritime leadership role (2254)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS will be used as a "backdoor" by environmental groups to force regulations on the U.S. (1427)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS will not be detrimental (318)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS will not create a "backdoor" for environmental groups to force regulations on the U.S. (1502)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS will not help resolve Arctic disputes with Russia (1625)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS will not threaten our intelligence operations (320)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS will not undermine Proliferation Security Initiative (319)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS won't help resolve disputes in South China Seas (1720)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS would be disadvantageous (656)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS would benefit marine conservation efforts (848)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS would bolster counter-piracy efforts (1591)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS would bolster efforts of Freedom of Navigation program (1245)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS would bolster homeland security and counterterrorism efforts (1226)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS would boost U.S. global leadership (395)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS would complicate counter-piracy efforts (1592)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS would damage national security (1700)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS would further advance collectivist idea of "common heritage of mankind" (862)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS would give United Nations ability to impose tax on U.S. citizens (696)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS would help moderate rising Chinese naval power (394)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS would help resolve disputes with Russia in Arctic (1562)
- U.S. ratification of UNCLOS would subject U.S. military to rulings by third-party tribunals (1035)
- U.S. should reject UNCLOS because of its revenue sharing agreements (943)
- U.S. underseas cable industry needs UNCLOS protection (708)
- U.S. underseas cable systems can be protected by existing laws or bilateral treaties (1246)
- U.S. will be able to challenge excessive claims more effectively as a party to UNCLOS (1791)
- U.S. will not be obligated to transfer technology under UNCLOS (661)
- U.S. would be obligated to transfer technology under UNCLOS (662)
- U.S. would not be exposing itself to liability for environmental damage in international courts by ratifying UNCLOS (854)
- UNCLOS has empirically been successful (1589)
- UNCLOS has empirically not been successful (1590)
- UNCLOS is best regime for Arctic Governance (849)
- UNCLOS is inadequate for protection of U.S. underseas cables (1227)
- UNCLOS is not administered by the United Nations (1225)
- UNCLOS necessary to protect rights of marine researchers (1301)
- UNCLOS participation would require U.S. to transfer significant royalties to International Seabed Authority (944)
- UNCLOS regime empirically has already shown that it is a stabilizing force (1033)
- UNCLOS regime is not a viable model for governing outer space (851)
- UNCLOS regime sets a good precedent for governance of outer space (646)
- UNCLOS treaty helps establish needed rule of law and governance regime for oceans (852)
- UNCLOS will not uniquely restrict submarine operations (1539)
- UNCLOS would give far-reaching regulatory powers to international and national bureacracies (812)
- UNCLOS would subject U.S. to anti-competitive regime (1793)
- Under UNCLOS, U.S. revenues from offshore resource extraction would be redistributed to non-desirable state actors (942)
- Underseas cables are vital to global economy (861)